Drunk Poetry: Coping with Japanese Provocations

Drunk Poetry: Coping with Japanese Provocations Since Japan performed the so-called "Island Purchase Drama" on September 11, China and Japan have had friendly exchanges for 40 years, but due to the ownership of Diaoyutai...

Drunk Poetry: Coping with Japanese Provocations Since Japan performed the so-called "Island Purchase Drama" on September 11, the friendly exchanges between China and Japan for 40 years have been brought to a freezing point by the dispute over the ownership of Diaoyutai. In addition to the recent war of words between the two sides and their own maritime exercises or joint military exercises, the people of the two countries have also shown their patriotism. Many exchange meetings have been suspended. They have boycotted each other and stopped going sightseeing. Almost 80% of the flights between China and Japan are empty. Does Shinzo Abe, the new leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, predict he will win Japan’s upcoming general election? The future "prime minister" led dozens of colleagues to visit the "Yasukuni Shrine" last week to offer incense to the memorial tablets of the executioners and war criminals who invaded China in World War II. This was widely publicized before and after the incident, and the purpose was nothing more than to stimulate the Chinese people. Various signs from military to diplomacy show that Japan is determined to win the dispute over Diaoyutai? Completely ignore the reaction of an opponent regarded by the world as "Rising China"? The Japanese pirates who fearlessly revived the ghost of "militarism" in the past are in line with the idiom "the fox pretends to be the tiger's power". What the Japanese hold is nothing more than the "US-Japan Security Treaty". Although their masters have emphasized on different occasions that they will not intervene in the "China-Japan dispute"? But it has repeatedly assured Japan that this treaty applies to the territory including the "Diaoyutai"? Such a naked public statement is to embolden the Japanese pirates, and is tantamount to warning Japan to let go of the fight. In the event of war with China, the United States will definitely abide by the "US-Japan Security Treaty" and join the Japanese alliance to jointly attack China. Is it simply "ungrateful" for the United States to treat China, its number one creditor, in this way? The purpose is to default on its debts. China owns more than one trillion U.S. national bonds. All of this money has been overdrawn long ago. How can it be repaid? In folk situations, when a friend owes a debt that cannot be repaid, if he is the "creditor" to collect the debt, and the debtor is unable to repay the debt, he will default on the debt, avoid the debt, or run away from the debt. He will often turn his back on the friend, break off the friendship or become strangers, and then respond with even more harsh words and deeds. The same is true for the country. When it is unable to repay its national debt, turning hostile is the best solution. In addition to the constant provocations by Japanese pirates, the two small countries of the Philippines and Vietnam are unusually unafraid to face the powerful neighbor "Rising China" without any fear. Especially Vietnam, which in the past claimed to be "comrades and brothers" with China, was single-handedly supported by China during the "Vietnam War". During the "Resist US Aggression and Aid Vietnam" era, the Chinese people scrimped on food and clothing and invested a lot of manpower and materials so that North Vietnam finally defeated the United States and achieved national independence. Now we are actually cooperating with our former "enemies" and "turning against China"? These small countries have invariably openly provoked China. Anyone with a discerning eye knows that they are instigated by their masterminds behind the scenes, and their purpose is to pave the way for the United States' "return to the Asia-Pacific" strategy. The latest global strategic plan of the United States is based on the high-sounding rhetoric of maintaining regional stability and peace? The real intention at heart is to "contain" China's rise. Recently, it has openly courted Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, India and other countries in order to complete its strategic and economic encirclement of China. Anyone who knows how to play mahjong knows that once someone wins, the mahjong cards on the table must be reshuffled. The United States, which has always wanted to control the world and regards itself as the international policeman, has long been clear about its ambitions. Now, not only is the country's economy in a mess, it is almost on the verge of bankruptcy? Seeing that China, the creditor country, is becoming increasingly "prosperous", China's national power and influence are expanding day by day. Over time, after the Eastern dragon awakens and grows stronger, the status of the United States has been shaken, and it can no longer "call the storm". Is Uncle Sam, who has always been the "boss", willing to "fall down" and be replaced by China? It is necessary to "reshuffle" the cards and develop a new strategy of "returning to the Asia-Pacific" to comprehensively contain the rising China. The previous state leaders of the Communist Party of China have repeatedly implemented the policy of "hiding a low profile" and being friendly to foreign countries. They would rather the people go hungry, but they would spend a lot of money and give gifts to countries in Southeast Asia, Northeast Asia, South Africa, Africa and other countries. Are they all showing to the world that China has no ambition to "invade" or "expand its territory"? After all, whether others believe it or not will be discussed next time. At least the United States, Britain and other Western countries have doubts? Today, the United States owes more and more huge debts to China, which it has reached the point of being unable to repay. Seeing that China's national power is gradually increasing and its status as the "world's policeman" has been shaken, how can we just watch the Stars and Stripes flying around the world be replaced by the Five-Star Red Flag? Therefore, the implementation of the latest strategic plan of "returning to the Asia-Pacific"; and the provocations of the small countries surrounding China. These small countries that do not know whether to live or die are all strategic pawns for the United States to reshuffle the cards. Therefore, whether it is the fight against Japanese pirates due to Diaoyutai, or the Philippines and Sansha Islands being provoked by Vietnam due to Scarborough Shoal? What China has to deal with is not these little foxes shouting in front of the stage, but the "big tigers" hiding behind the foxes who owe huge debts and are bent on evading, avoiding, and defaulting on debts! China deals with these little foxes, which is just a temporary solution; if it wants to finally solve the problem, it still has to face the evil tiger of the United States, which is running rampant. Only then can it cure the root cause!