亚利桑那移民法3条规定被驳 最具争议部分保留

亚利桑那移民法3条规定被驳 最具争议部分保留 新华网华盛顿6月25日电（记者王丰丰孙浩）美国最高法院25日…

高法的裁决是围绕亚利桑那州移民法4条主要规定作出的，其中允许警察盘查怀疑为非法移民者移民地位的条款获得保留。主笔本案判决书的高法法官安东尼-肯尼迪说，因为亚利桑那州尚未将这一条款付诸实践，因此高法无法判定其是否与联邦法律抵触。

除此之外，亚利桑那州移民法中遭联邦政府反对的另外3条规定全被高法推翻，它们包括规定在亚利桑那州非法居留触犯州法律；规定非法移民在亚利桑那州工作或找工作触犯州法律；规定警察可以在没有逮捕证的情况下逮捕被怀疑为非法移民者。 The Supreme Court believes that these three provisions conflict with federal law.理由是，联邦法律已将非法居留定为非法，不用各州再多此一举；国会选择不将非法移民在美工作入罪，各州不能自行其是；是否及何时逮捕非法移民是联邦政府的职权范围，州一级机构不能随意行事。

高法在判决书中写道，亚利桑那州对非法移民问题处理感到失望可以理解，但这不代表该州可以施行与联邦法律抵触的地方政策。

This ruling revolves around a bill to combat illegal immigration signed by Arizona Governor Jane Brewer in April 2010. Immediately after the law was signed, the federal government filed an appeal asking a court to prohibit Arizona from enforcing many of its provisions. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Arizona could not enforce four of the main provisions, and the state sued the Supreme Court. Since many states have enacted similar immigration laws in recent years, the Supreme Court’s ruling on this case may become an important precedent. In addition, since the immigration issue has attracted much attention from Hispanic voters, the judgment in this case will also have a certain impact on the presidential election.