>Mainland China should not be afraid of the multi-party system

Mainland China should not be afraid of the multi-party system Uncle Jia Western countries, the United States and the United Kingdom, are most emphasizing on democracy and human rights, but the United States and Britain fail to implement democracy and human rights. Their police shoot and beat people at any time...

Mainland China should not be afraid of the multi-party system. Uncle Jia The United States and the United Kingdom in the West are the most democratic and emphasizing human rights. However, the United States and the United Kingdom fail to implement democracy and human rights. Their police shoot and beat people at any time. By using 911 to prevent terrorism, they inhumanely discriminate against people entering and leaving the border, and use heavy laws, prisons and torture to control troubled times. Singapore also advocates democracy and human rights. However, Singapore does not respect democracy and human rights. People who throw cigarette butts or graffiti are punished with mosses. They also use the national security law established in the century to arrest suspicious persons at any time and imprison them indefinitely. On the contrary, mainland China, where the situation of democracy and human rights has improved, turns a blind eye and exaggerates the situation. Every time a dissident is arrested or a group of people are dispersed, European and American people criticize democracy and human rights. As the world has been hit hard by Western democracy and human rights in recent years, many countries around the world have begun to protest against hegemony, such as Egypt and Syria's anti-hegemony; Thailand and the Philippines' anti-corruption; Taiwan and Hong Kong's anti-incompetence, and people have taken to the streets to shout. If the government is really hegemonic, corrupt or incompetent, taking to the streets to protest is understandable, but it is a pity if it is just a partisan fight full of complaints. Because Mainland China maintains a one-party system, there is no confrontation between opposition parties and no right to march on the streets. Every time people feel aggrieved and clash with the police, it is all official talk. Therefore, people in the West often mistakenly say that there is no democracy and human rights. In order to express the West's confidence in the government and safeguard the government's democratic and human rights, why is the Chinese mainland government afraid of opening up political parties, accommodating knowledgeable people, and jointly promoting national prosperity? Singapore's century-long stability and prosperity are all due to Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew's magnanimity. He can tolerate dissidents, unlike the Chinese who are narrow-minded and do not tolerate others' superiority. They "hate their abilities and fail to use them, and they hate their talents to death." Lee Kuan Yew was even more anti-communist than Chiang Kai-shek. Chiang Kai-shek would not tolerate even half a communist or any dissident. What would be the outcome? However, Lee Kuan Yew did not exclude communists, but also tolerated communists and dissidents. The so-called knowing yourself and the enemy makes people convinced. The British have ruled Hong Kong for 100 years, and they have always made good use of the strategy of using China to control China. Japan also followed Wang Jingwei's puppet government and controlled half of China's mountains and rivers. If it hadn't been for the two atomic bombs, what would China have become now?