Arizona refuses bail for immigrants, the Supreme Court vetoes
Arizona refuses bail for immigrants, the Supreme Court vetoes Hundreds of illegal immigrants held without bail under Arizona's draconian anti-immigration law may soon have a chance...
The Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling three weeks ago that overturned Arizona's tough anti-immigration law passed in 2006, the Associated Press reported. The anti-immigration law denies bail to illegal immigrants detained on felony charges. The felony charges include shoplifting, aggravated identity theft, sexual assault and homicide.
Illegal immigrants are often detained in jails for months while this draconian law is enforced. They often plead guilty and are turned over to federal immigration authorities for deportation.
The federal Supreme Court ruling has cleared the way for a new wave of bail hearings across Arizona.
Last month, an 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Arizona’s draconian anti-immigration law, saying the law violated people’s due process rights by imposing punishment before trial. The committee also said the law was a "shoot-to-shoot" approach to all immigrants, some of whom may have fled their home countries to escape persecution by authoritarian authorities. There is no evidence that the law addresses an issue of particular importance.
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and County Attorney Bill Montgomery defended the state law in court.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) welcomed the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Cecillia Wang, director of the ACLU's Immigrant Rights Project, said: "Today's Supreme Court ruling should thwart Arizona's unconstitutional attempt to throw away the presumption of innocence and everyone's right to a bail hearing."
Sources and usage
This piece is republished or synchronized with permission and keeps a link back to the original source.